"Hello again
fellas. Welcome to your 30s. Hope the last couple of
years were good to you. I see Cameron was able to
pry himself away from the monitor-life so there's hope
for you guys yet..."
The boys
are most definitely back. Looking at these
pictures is kind of a mixed bag for me. I'm
excited as hell to see them again, but I'm
still in perfectionist mode and these
incarnations are kinda like copies of copies?
There's this feeling of fakeness with them
and it still slightly makes my skin crawl. I
have to take some blame for it however. 5
years and 20 pounds will certainly add to the
feeling of "something isn't right". The rest
is just hair and make-up and this is a great
starting point. These guys will look
different as we work our way through these
next 13 shows.
The
green-screening actually did turn out as bad
as I feared. If you watch just the
full-screen video of each shot it's dirty as
hell. In techincal terms that means there's
blotches of green flashing all around the
subject and on the flip side (as with G's
hair strands) it actually makes them
disappear from time to time. It's what
happens when the green screen isn't lit
properly, and other than frame by frame
roto-work (cropping out the subject for every
frame) there's nothing you can do. Roto is
obviously not an option for a piece with such
a quick turnaround time, so I settled for the
next best thing:
Showing
them from far-fuggin-away.
:-)
Basically
we never get closer than a 2-shot and it's
never an issue. It worked fine for the
test show, but we have to make sure
we nail the lighting from now on because
to not be able to have a full-screen shot
is really limiting. This angle with
Cameron however is a problem. It's
anything but flattering and when we cut to
the close-up of him it's flat-out
embarrasing. I might as well be
Brando. No idea how to fit everything into
the shot without me leaning back
though...
The
shots where I had to use the photo
worked fine for a "last second save", but
certainly stand out in comparison. The
lighting is way off and it's just too
flat. Moving video will always look
different than a still even if you fake a
steady zoom-in as I did.
Luckily
all of this is the complete geek in me and
it's gonna come off fine, especially for a
little internet clip. I've also gotten
pretty good at looking at things from
other perspectives and it allows me to
stop screwing with it soooooo much. I'm
certain this is more extensive than they
imagined.
Which
of course brings us to the real drama in
all of this: we still haven't come to an
agreement on the contract and this test
show had inadvertently become my only real
bargaining power. Realize that no one at
CBS has any clue of what I can do
other than that goofy 2 minute clip. So
when I try to explain to them that
editing this bit is a good 30 hours at a
minimum they think I'm CRAZY. It's mainly
because it's all effects shots. It took
forever to put this together. Now in time,
I'm pretty sure I can get this puppy
down to 20 hours but that's if we do the
same thing every week, which I know
they'll want to change.
I have
to believe however, once
they see this
clip...they'll
understand. This has to be one of the most
complicated "Webisodes" ever produced. It
certainly seems out of place for just the
internet...and of course that's my goal. I
want it to SCREAM broadcast. I mean
they're already putting time and money
into it...why wouldn't they want to get
more out of it? That's why not
having a perfect green-screen or hair
piece is such a focus for me. I see this
as the catalyst to so much more...and
we're so damn CLOSE. We'll get
there...
For now
however I get to wait patiently ALLLLLL
night as I wait for a conference call in
the morning to see what everyone in NY
thought. It's a very interesting stress
I must admit. I think I mentioned this
back in September, but this kind of stress?
It trumps anonymity like a MOFO. I'm in the
game. The stress of making the 3-pointer is
actually FUN. The stress of sitting on the
bench when you KNOW you can make the
3-pointer will obliterate your SOUL.